On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:26:17AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > 20k/sec, this is > > probably only for fairly popular files... > > I ran a few tests on a variety of large files, and amazingly, by > increasing the concurrent requests to 40 or 60, I could actually get up > to 70-90k/sec! This is on a cable connection with maximum downstream > throughput of 160k/sec! Additionally, I didn't notice any particular > degredation in my machine's performance (1.6 P4 512MB ram). 40-60 concurrent requests is _a lot_. Each one will probably require at least 2 threads. Your node would not be able to do much else while doing such a download. And there are of course interactions with our 1-3 threads per connection limitation too. Much of this will be addressed with nio and related changes. > > When downloading from Kazaa, you are very lucky to see that kind of > throughput, yet I was able to get it consistently from Freenet on a > variety of files. Amazing. > > Ian. > > > -- > Ian Clarke ian at locut.us > Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ > Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/ > Get Freenet http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8891/iCnXWoOUlxA/ > Link good for 24 hours from this email
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org/amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://80-192-4-36.cable.ubr09.na.blueyonder.co.uk:8889/N1E-K~HDr2Q/ ICTHUS. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030312/0f8b876f/attachment.pgp>
