On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:26:17AM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > 20k/sec, this is
> > probably only for fairly popular files...
>
> I ran a few tests on a variety of large files, and amazingly, by
> increasing the concurrent requests to 40 or 60, I could actually get up
> to 70-90k/sec! This is on a cable connection with maximum downstream
> throughput of 160k/sec! Additionally, I didn't notice any particular
> degredation in my machine's performance (1.6 P4 512MB ram).
Hrm, how well does the current codebase work with that sort of number of
threads? IN the past, I was having the node RNF on 30 threads or so,
however to be fair, my codebase is from january - if I'm able to squeeze
more threads now, that could make things better for the streaming stuff
- jj
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
