Ouch, that is serious. They are using the definition from the Terrorism Act 2000?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > Jei wrote: > > >Clarke's draft bill proposes new offence of glorification > > It's also worth noting that the British definition of terrorism is > extremely broad, covering politically-motivated vandalism and computer > crime. So glorifying those things would also be illegal. > > http://www.magnacartaplus.org/bills/terrorism/#definition > > Cheers, > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20050916/6af8f4a1/attachment.pgp>
