On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:48:02PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > >Ouch, that is serious. They are using the definition from the Terrorism > >Act 2000? > > > Looks like it - see page 15 of this PDF: > > http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs4/Print-02C.PDF > > I guess we have to be careful what we say about the Great Firewall from > now on. Ho hum.
ROFL, seeking to hack the Great Firewall a criminal offence in the UK! > > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20050917/cabeb866/attachment.pgp>
