On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 01:06:57PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > On 17 Sep 2005, at 12:36, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > >The major problem with git from a freenet pov is that it is unix > >only so far. There is > >Mercurial (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi) which > >was started at > >the same time as git with the same goals. There is a windows > >version and it is being > >used by the Xen project. From what I understand its storage model > >is not quite as > >freenet friendly as (unpacked) git. Either of these managers would > >make distributed > >development easier. > > Subversion seems like the obvious choice to me. It was created by > the same people that created CVS, and thus switching to it should > cause minimal disruption. It has cross platform support, and there > is a Subversion plugin for Eclipse. I have personally used > Subversion on a number of projects and have no complaints about it.
Is its architecture suitable? Each client having a full copy of the repository would be highly preferable, as would a more or less P2P compatible architecture (not needing to connect to a central server for everything). > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20050917/d743c6e7/attachment.pgp>
