On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:44:56AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > >If you are approaching this from perspective "but people want it" > >then a lot of people want blocks to be marked by the extension of > >the file, so that they can say "i only want MP3 in my datastore" > >are you planning to implement this? Then why are you still going > >for the opennet? > > Now this really is a silly argument. We don't make it easy for > people to filter their datastores because it would hurt Freenet, but > allowing people to be part of an opennet, having made an informed > decision to do so, doesn't hurt Freenet, it helps the network by > allowing more peers and a richer link density.
Only if it doesn't completely undermine efforts to build a true darknet. How do we make opennet's existence not cause darknet's non-existence? That is the question. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060628/2fc0f1d5/attachment.pgp>
