On Saturday 20 May 2006 10:26, you wrote:
> > We could (should?) also include a field for the new URI.
> imho we shouldn't : the purpose is just to advertize that the key has
> been blown.
But we agree on that including a new URI to transparently redirect the
user to instead of simply showing "*meep* you're fucked" does increase
the user experience, don't we? :)
> NextGen$
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060520/a6ea526d/attachment.pgp>
