On Saturday 20 May 2006 12:03, you wrote:
> Why don't I want to allow new keys to be stored into revocation keys
> ? Because I do trust people I'll give the revocation key enough for
> revoking my key, but not enough to give them the private key. So I
> don't want to allow them to regen&distribute a new key ;)
With the simple system there is no special revocation key, or did I
misunderstand something? If SRK is just a wrapper around SSK the
revocation key would be the same as your SSK private key, wouldn't it?
> NextGen$
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060520/e19f785c/attachment.pgp>
