* David 'Bombe' Roden <droden at gmail.com> [2006-05-20 12:18:40]: > On Saturday 20 May 2006 12:03, you wrote: > > > Why don't I want to allow new keys to be stored into revocation keys > > ? Because I do trust people I'll give the revocation key enough for > > revoking my key, but not enough to give them the private key. So I > > don't want to allow them to regen&distribute a new key ;) > > With the simple system there is no special revocation key, or did I > misunderstand something?
just like USKs are ;) > If SRK is just a wrapper around SSK the > revocation key would be the same as your SSK private key, wouldn't it? no, it wouldn't : it would be a different key. that's the purpose. > > > NextGen$ > > David > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
