* Ed Tomlinson <edt at aei.ca> [2006-10-15 19:22:57]: > Hi, > > What happens if one just happens to find out the node that cannot be > removed is obsolete
Then it can wait for a week before getting removed ... power users will set it to ListenOnly so that it won't spend any bandwidth trying to connect to the other side. >compromised or untrustworthy? How could the user be aware of a compromised node ? untrustworthy shouldn't happen, never ;) > A warning might be a better idea here? > I'm not sure about that... people aren't reading warnings :/ > Ed > > On Saturday 14 October 2006 07:57, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2006-10-14 11:57:08 +0000 (Sat, 14 Oct 2006) > > New Revision: 10661 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/DarknetConnectionsToadlet.java > > Log: > > Small hack on fproxy to deny node removal if there isn't one week of > > inactivity. > > Maybe it should be done in Node.removeDarknetConnection insteed. > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- NextGen$. "On peut ob??r aux lois en souhaitant qu'elles changent, comme on sert ? la guerre en souhaitant la paix." Merleau Ponty - L'?loge de la philosophie
