On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 07:08:55PM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > I'm 100% sure that if we don't enforce it, most people won't agree with > connecting to transitent nodes... There is no gain for them. On the > other hand, if we don't find a way for transitent nodes to "hook" on the > main network reliably, we will see them pushing for stupid things like > opennet ;) > > I think that finding connections once and maintaining them is manageable > for anyone. I understand people who get frustrated because all their > connections are gone when they are back from WE. Hence I would like to > do something for them.
This is entirely reasonable. I suggest that you introduce a confirmation dialog, and make it a lot more aggressive if you are about to remove a node which a) has been connected at least once, and b) the time since it was last connected is less than a week. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061024/25cedc06/attachment.pgp>
