On Friday 01 August 2008 15:39, Theodore Hong wrote: > Ian Clarke <ian.clarke at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Toseland > > <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > >> On Thursday 31 July 2008 17:42, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > >> IMHO the problem is location churn. The solution is for opennet nodes not to > >> swap. But we need simulations before we can deploy that. Which Vive promised > >> to do... > > > > Why would opennet nodes possibly benefit from swapping? That works in > > opposition to the edge selection algorithm we use for opennet. I'd > > deploy that fix immediately, with or without a simulation. We can > > then follow-up with a simulation to confirm it. > > Hm, I would be wary of making algorithm changes without having some > evidence first to show that they'll work, or at least not damage the > current network.
My worry is what it would do to a hybrid dark/open network. > > theo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080801/0c26e757/attachment.pgp>
