On Friday 01 August 2008 16:23, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Theodore Hong > <theodore.hong at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > Ian Clarke <ian.clarke at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Toseland > >> <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > >>> On Thursday 31 July 2008 17:42, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > >>> IMHO the problem is location churn. The solution is for opennet nodes not to > >>> swap. But we need simulations before we can deploy that. Which Vive promised > >>> to do... > >> > >> Why would opennet nodes possibly benefit from swapping? That works in > >> opposition to the edge selection algorithm we use for opennet. I'd > >> deploy that fix immediately, with or without a simulation. We can > >> then follow-up with a simulation to confirm it. > > > > Hm, I would be wary of making algorithm changes without having some > > evidence first to show that they'll work, or at least not damage the > > current network. > > > > theo > > Currently, putting a openet-only node offline for a few hours would > result in location change -- this is really bad. > > I can't find where is the opennet edge selection code is -- can anyone > confirm it have been implemented?
You mean path folding? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080801/7de2fa66/attachment.pgp>
