On Feb 6, 2008 4:16 PM, Michael Rogers <m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk> wrote: [snip] > I wonder if we can work out a way for the two swapping nodes to commit > to their locations and peer-locations without revealing them until the > swap has been agreed? (For example by sending the hash of the list > instead of the list?)
Hm. I wonder if the millionaires protocol might be useful here.
