Matthew Toseland wrote: > I don't understand the graph. Isn't it the same as the previous graph based > on > bogus numbers?
In the graph based on bogus numbers the lines were pretty much identical. Here there's a constant difference that never seems to disappear, and using the same random number for both nodes seems to make the difference slightly larger. I haven't simulated routing yet, only measured the mean distance between neighbours - I might get some more time over the weekend. Cheers, Michael
