Matthew Toseland wrote: > So a swap will only happen if it minimises stress for *both* nodes, rather > than before it would happen if it minimised total stress for both nodes > combined. Clearly this is a significant change to the transition > probabilities... It might very well lead to false minima?
Yup, I thought it might just reach the optimal solution more slowly but it seems to get permanently stuck at suboptimal solutions. > One thing to try is > to use the same random for each node's decision (since this is likely how it > will be implemented in practice). See attached - using the same random number seems to make things slightly worse, I don't know why. Cheers, Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SelfishSim.java Type: text/x-java Size: 726 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080221/ffc10331/attachment.java> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: results.png Type: image/png Size: 4156 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080221/ffc10331/attachment.png>
