On Thursday 07 February 2008 01:00, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > We already do this. > > Ah, cool. :-) > > > I presume that the latter tactic would be best, since we don't know the node's > > location: send a swap request with our location set to m, and all our peers > > at (m + 0.5) modulo 1.0. > > I see what you mean. Perhaps a node should only attempt to reduce its > own stress (in Robert's terms), rather than the product of its stress > and the other node's stress?
That's an interesting idea. Wouldn't it result in much slower network evolution? Simulate it, if it looks promising we should ask Oskar. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080207/331722b1/attachment.pgp>
