On Friday 11 July 2008 16:36, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Matthew Toseland
> <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2008 04:23, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> >> * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-07-10 16:55:23]:
> >>
> >> > On Thursday 10 July 2008 10:44, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> >> > > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-07-07 
> >> > > 12:17:33]:
> >> > > > 7. Automatic bandwidth limit calibration. (Toad)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Several other p2p apps implement this, we should too. Bandwidth is
> > *the*
> >> > > > scarce resource most of the time, we want to use as much of it as 
we
> > can
> >> > > > without significantly slowing down the user's internet connection 
(see
> >> > > > above).
> >> > >
> >> > > I don't think that such a thing can reliably work. It might work in 
80%
> >> > > of the cases but will badly screw up in others.
> >> >
> >> > It works for other p2p's. What specifically is the problem for Freenet?
> > Small
> >> > number of connections?
> >>
> >> Small number of connections *and* usage of UDP! Do you know any p2p
> >> protocol which uses mainly UDP and does what you call "automatic
> >> bandwidth limit calibration"?
> >>
> >> E2k uses TCP, bittorrent uses TCP... As far as I know, only their links
> >> to DHTs use UDP (Kademilia); they don't use it for data transfert.
> >
> > Then how do they get through NATs? Are you sure your information is up to
> > date?
> 
> Ed2k use kademilia and/or server to ask the peer to callback. They
> can't communicate if both side are behind NAT. (This is called "LowID"
> in ed2k world)
> 
> Original BT just doesn't work behind NAT. Newer variant use UDP to ask
> for callback.

You mean when one side is behind a NAT the other side uses UDP to ask it? Or 
what?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080711/c5f3ec2b/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to