* Michael Rogers <m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk> [2008-07-22 22:38:12]: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Should we enable FOAF routing anyway, and if so, which mitigation measures > > do > > we need to implement first? Note that encrypted tunnels would not solve > > this > > problem, as they are impacted by it also (if we do rendezvous at a key, and > > use FOAF-routing; random walk rendezvous wouldn't be affected). > > I'm not sure that limiting the traffic per peer will solve the problem.
If it does on darknet that's good enough for me :) > Perhaps we just need to accept that opennet will never be fully secure? It's obvious that it won't ever be secure. NextGen$ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080722/536619e5/attachment.pgp>
