On Wednesday 23 July 2008 12:38, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Why/how is this exacerbated by FOAF-routing exactly? If it isn't then it's > > orthogonal. > > Exactly - the problem of an attacker being able to attract most of our > traffic isn't specific to FOAF, so there's no point looking for a > FOAF-specific solution.
So you are saying that we should only worry about FOAF on darknet, where there clearly is an FOAF-specific problem? > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080723/7b31b490/attachment.pgp>
