* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-07-31 17:37:41]:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:33, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Robert Mead <rmead at justconnected.dyndns.org> [2008-07-22 18:21:14]: > > > > > So it sounds like it will be about as secure as it currently is, but a > > > lot more efficient. 5 to 3 is a big difference. > > > > ... On a small, ideal network. > > On a larger, messier network, it should make *more* difference. That is, if > routing is the problem. Am I the only one thinking that routing isn't the problem but churn is? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080731/e0b7fcf0/attachment.pgp>
