-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> We should in the near future implement reliably exposing our peers' >> locations >> to our peers, and use it to implement using our peers' peers' locations for >> better routing. According to Oskar and Vive, who refer to published papers, >> this should significantly improve performance relative to simple greedy >> routing. I believe the correct algorithm is to simply route to the node >> which >> either has the closest location to the target, or whose best peer is closest >> to the target. > > One issue to consider: what happens when nodes go offline? There's no > point routing to my peer based on his peer's location if his peer is > offline, so how often do we need to update this information and what are > the traffic and anonymity implications of doing so? > > Just a thought, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl Weight by uptime? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhRlrgACgkQY1TiZN0ugjtergCgqbq1lPj5Xd4CrNP/GlKxtHwm PiIAoNe5JNdUbEBItNNpAl+pd5fqHZd6 =BygM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
