On Thursday 12 June 2008 22:52, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Michael Rogers <m.rogers at cs.ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > One issue to consider: what happens when nodes go offline? There's no > > point routing to my peer based on his peer's location if his peer is > > offline, so how often do we need to update this information and what are > > the traffic and anonymity implications of doing so? > > I don't see why nodes couldn't inform their neighbors immediately if > one of their neighbors goes offline, or comes online.
Exactly. At one hop, the latency is low, the bandwidth cost is low too. > > Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080612/2adc144a/attachment.pgp>
