On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:48, Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > >> IPv6 will > >> probably solve most of the NAT and IP issues with time. > >> > > > > No, first IPv6 will probably not be widely used for a loooong time, secondly, > > people will probably still use evil firewalls if not NATs, especially on > > shared/public connections, thirdly fast mobile connections are billed per gig > > and slow ones are throttled so severely as to be unusable for us, and this is > > likely to remain true for some time IMHO. > > "with time"... But I don't suppose there will be need for double NATs, > or even NATs at all? I was of the belief that much security will be > moved to the OS with IPv6 and enough addresses for every single device > out there to get its own. We will probably see even more support for > UPnP too?
I doubt it. But we'll see. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081126/6f076e81/attachment.pgp>
