On Wednesday 17 June 2009 00:48:44 Juiceman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Matthew
> Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 23:16:58 Zero3 wrote:
> >> I've successfully (I think?) branched the master branch of
> >> wininstaller-staging at github to a new beta branch. This branch now
> >> contains the upcoming Windows tray icon.
> >>
> >> Please feel free to test. Even small fixes like spelling and grammar is
> >> more than welcome (because mine suck ;)).
> >>
> >> Source: http://github.com/freenet/wininstaller-staging/tree/beta
> >> Binary: http://privat.zero3.dk/FreenetInstaller_Beta.exe (old jars,
> >> seednodes, translations and so on. Not meant for anything but testing)
> >
> > Cool!
> >>
> >> The update.cmd script will soon need to support the updating of various
> >> helper executables, most importantly freenetlauncher.exe, but if
> >> possible, all of them.
> >
> > Ok.
> >>
> >> (Are these on the website somewhere yet Matthew? Along with a plan of
> >> how they are kept up-to-date...)
> >>
> >> If update.cmd tries to update bin\freenettray.exe, it should first do
> >> something like:
> >>
> >> taskkill /IM freenettray.exe
> >> if not errorlevel 1 <remember to start it again afterwards>
> >>
> >> (... as we can't update running Windows executables)
> >
> > https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/[filename]
> > for filename in:
> > wrapper-windows-x86-32.exe wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll start.exe stop.exe 
> > freenetlauncher.exe
> 
> It would be great if we could see the directory listing when we access
> https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/ is this possible?
> 
> How do you suggest we check for newer versions of the files?
> Downloading them all and then comparing is a waste of bandwidth... I
> could compare the .sha1 of the files if those exist.  That would be
> minuscule bandwidth.
> 
> I propose to start checking freenet-ext.jar this way, saving almost 4mb per 
> run.

Yes, that is exactly how it is supposed to work. Furthermore, checking the 
.sha1 over HTTPS is a good thing in terms of security. So please go for it!
> 
> > Tag the wininstaller, and tell me, when you want them updating.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090617/056ad779/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to