On Wednesday 17 June 2009 02:45:19 Juiceman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Matthew > Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 00:48:44 Juiceman wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Matthew > >> Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > >> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 23:16:58 Zero3 wrote: > >> >> I've successfully (I think?) branched the master branch of > >> >> wininstaller-staging at github to a new beta branch. This branch now > >> >> contains the upcoming Windows tray icon. > >> >> > >> >> Please feel free to test. Even small fixes like spelling and grammar is > >> >> more than welcome (because mine suck ;)). > >> >> > >> >> Source: http://github.com/freenet/wininstaller-staging/tree/beta > >> >> Binary: http://privat.zero3.dk/FreenetInstaller_Beta.exe (old jars, > >> >> seednodes, translations and so on. Not meant for anything but testing) > >> > > >> > Cool! > >> >> > >> >> The update.cmd script will soon need to support the updating of various > >> >> helper executables, most importantly freenetlauncher.exe, but if > >> >> possible, all of them. > >> > > >> > Ok. > >> >> > >> >> (Are these on the website somewhere yet Matthew? Along with a plan of > >> >> how they are kept up-to-date...) > >> >> > >> >> If update.cmd tries to update bin\freenettray.exe, it should first do > >> >> something like: > >> >> > >> >> taskkill /IM freenettray.exe > >> >> if not errorlevel 1 <remember to start it again afterwards> > >> >> > >> >> (... as we can't update running Windows executables) > >> > > >> > https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/[filename] > >> > for filename in: > >> > wrapper-windows-x86-32.exe wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll start.exe stop.exe > >> > freenetlauncher.exe > >> > >> It would be great if we could see the directory listing when we access > >> https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/ is this possible? > >> > >> How do you suggest we check for newer versions of the files? > >> Downloading them all and then comparing is a waste of bandwidth... I > >> could compare the .sha1 of the files if those exist. ?That would be > >> minuscule bandwidth. > >> > >> I propose to start checking freenet-ext.jar this way, saving almost 4mb > >> per run. > > > > Yes, that is exactly how it is supposed to work. Furthermore, checking the > > .sha1 over HTTPS is a good thing in terms of security. So please go for it! > > I can't tell for sure because directory listing is denied on that > folder of the website, but I don't think the .sha1 files for the > downloads are in https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/
Hmmm, that's wierd. Get the sha1 from /latest/ then. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090617/fa573f14/attachment.pgp>
