On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Matthew Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 00:48:44 Juiceman wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Matthew >> Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: >> > On Tuesday 16 June 2009 23:16:58 Zero3 wrote: >> >> I've successfully (I think?) branched the master branch of >> >> wininstaller-staging at github to a new beta branch. This branch now >> >> contains the upcoming Windows tray icon. >> >> >> >> Please feel free to test. Even small fixes like spelling and grammar is >> >> more than welcome (because mine suck ;)). >> >> >> >> Source: http://github.com/freenet/wininstaller-staging/tree/beta >> >> Binary: http://privat.zero3.dk/FreenetInstaller_Beta.exe (old jars, >> >> seednodes, translations and so on. Not meant for anything but testing) >> > >> > Cool! >> >> >> >> The update.cmd script will soon need to support the updating of various >> >> helper executables, most importantly freenetlauncher.exe, but if >> >> possible, all of them. >> > >> > Ok. >> >> >> >> (Are these on the website somewhere yet Matthew? Along with a plan of >> >> how they are kept up-to-date...) >> >> >> >> If update.cmd tries to update bin\freenettray.exe, it should first do >> >> something like: >> >> >> >> taskkill /IM freenettray.exe >> >> if not errorlevel 1 <remember to start it again afterwards> >> >> >> >> (... as we can't update running Windows executables) >> > >> > https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/[filename] >> > for filename in: >> > wrapper-windows-x86-32.exe wrapper-windows-x86-32.dll start.exe stop.exe >> > freenetlauncher.exe >> >> It would be great if we could see the directory listing when we access >> https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/ is this possible? >> >> How do you suggest we check for newer versions of the files? >> Downloading them all and then comparing is a waste of bandwidth... I >> could compare the .sha1 of the files if those exist. ?That would be >> minuscule bandwidth. >> >> I propose to start checking freenet-ext.jar this way, saving almost 4mb per >> run. > > Yes, that is exactly how it is supposed to work. Furthermore, checking the > .sha1 over HTTPS is a good thing in terms of security. So please go for it!
I can't tell for sure because directory listing is denied on that folder of the website, but I don't think the .sha1 files for the downloads are in https://checksums.freenetproject.org/cc/
