On Saturday 16 May 2009 23:20:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote: > > Wouldn't it take much load off the "internet", i.e. small bandwidth > > connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for > > routing requests if possible? > > I assume that it would also help privacy, because then timing analysis and > similar would become much harder, since external nodes can't look into the > LAN. > > To avoid too easy internal traceability, the option of switching to port 8080 > or 5223 (jabber server with SSL) (or 80 if started with sufficient rights) > would be nice. It would avoid the question "what exactly are you running?"
Not much point hiding it if you're broadcasting the existence of nodes via MDNSDiscovery! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090516/8481e709/attachment.pgp>
