On Friday 15 May 2009 18:37:12 Thomas Sachau wrote: > xor schrieb: > > On Thursday 14 May 2009 19:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> Matthew Toseland schrieb: > >>> My observation: Can we get rid of the "I will configure it manually" > >>> choice? And maybe the welcome page? (#3094) > >> > >> You want to force everyone to use the Wizard? > >> > >>> Because we were both on the same LAN, it did not connect, until I told > >>> him to set it to allow local addresses on that peer. There should be a > >>> checkbox when adding a noderef, defaulting to on, "Friend may be on the > >>> same local network as me" or something. (#3098) > >> > >> This is imho not usual, so i would set this to very low priority and > >> only for advanced mode enabled. > > > > IMHO the current behavior is a "bug" though: We have the MDNS plugin, > > which is installed by default and should automatically (opennet-) connect > > nodes on a LAN. However it does not work because LAN connections are > > disallowed by default. > > Afaik that plugin is no longer installed by default.
Why not? I like the idea of self-organizing Freenet on LANs very much :) Especially if you consider large public or private LANs where two people running Freenet might not even know each others, so they couldn't get manually connected. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090515/5f98f7bc/attachment.pgp>
