Arne Babenhauserheide schrieb: > On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote: >> Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can >> choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for >> this philosophy, therefor i vote against such a script for linux. > > But in Gentoo it would also be possible to add a use flag to select the > browser, which just tells freenet which browser to use. >
Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens, when the selected browser has no privacy mode enabled, while another has it? This was and still is no real option. Simple and easy is only the warning page, everyone sees it, everyone can act as written there. All choices still open and if anyone chooses to act like an idiot, it is his own problem. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 315 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090518/2544e319/attachment.pgp>
