* Ian Clarke <ian at locut.us> [2009-05-30 09:37:15]: > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Florent Daigni?re > <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > Well, the website is all about its content; not the engine... I do think > > that google's website thingy (http://sites.google.com) is more than > > enough for our purpose. > > I like this idea, provided that it is sufficient to meet our needs. > For example, it would be hard to do things like dynamic updating of > our account balance - which seems to have a very positive effect on > donations. I guess we could run some code elsewhere that periodically > updates this (does Google Pages have an API?). > > Can you have your own domain name with Google Pages? >
Probably, through google-apps; We use that at work. > Google App Engine would afford the most flexibility (but also the most > rope to hang ourselves), and it now supports Java. If we do migrate > the website we *must* endeavor to make it look good, people have much > higher expectations about a website's appearance today than they did 9 > years ago. Ideally we should grab some open source web code to use as > a basis (perhaps something from Mozilla). > Tools won't help the fact that we don't have good web-designers :) NextGen$ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090530/858377ca/attachment.pgp>
