On Saturday 30 May 2009 15:37:15 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Florent Daigni?re > <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > Well, the website is all about its content; not the engine... I do think > > that google's website thingy (http://sites.google.com) is more than > > enough for our purpose. > > I like this idea, provided that it is sufficient to meet our needs. > For example, it would be hard to do things like dynamic updating of > our account balance - which seems to have a very positive effect on > donations. I guess we could run some code elsewhere that periodically > updates this (does Google Pages have an API?). > > Can you have your own domain name with Google Pages?
Google Sites is a dynamic thingy, basically all we need is static web hosting for pages and a few big files. The few big files will be served through coralcache unless we have a huge monthly transfer limit. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090530/4f0581f0/attachment.pgp>
