On Saturday 24 October 2009 00:38:48 Juiceman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Toseland
> <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > I have merged the beta branch of the wininstaller, in accordance with 
> > instructions from Juiceman and Zero3. The main changes in this branch are 
> > that it doesn't create a custom user to run Freenet in (which caused many 
> > problems for many users installing it due to password policies, anti-virus 
> > software, and things we don't understand), and that it has a system tray 
> > icon, from where the user can conveniently (provided his system tray isn't 
> > hopelessly cluttered already) start or stop or browse Freenet.
> >
> > In testing, it works, and so does Freenet. However there are a number of 
> > issues we need to deal with:
> > - "Launch Freenet after installation" - Freenet will run anyway, launching 
> > it means browsing it, maybe we should change "Launch Freenet" here and in 
> > the system tray menu to "Browse Freenet"?
> > - TUFI menus don't show up well in Chrome. Chrome is our default browser on 
> > Windows because it has incognito mode, which we use. The author of TUFI 
> > should fix the stylesheet so that the drop-down menus are usable on Chrome, 
> > please! (Can somebody please forward this request via the FMS board please?)
> > - Chrome sometimes seems to lose the web interface CSS, showing either a 
> > blank screen or a non-styled copy of the loading a page or dangerous 
> > content page. There were no errors in the log concerning fproxy. Reload and 
> > even shift+reload make no difference, but restarting Chrome fixes this. 
> > Initially I had thought it might be related to it using lots of connections 
> > as I was loading many sites with many images, but that didn't seem to make 
> > any difference. Thoughts?
> > - We have a flag to tell Freenet that we are running Chrome in incognito 
> > mode, which will show a much shorter and less worrying browsers warning at 
> > the beginning of the wizard. However, bugs in Chrome mean that just because 
> > we tell Chrome to open Freenet in incognito mode doesn't mean it actually 
> > will. I had turned off this flag, Juiceman turned it back on, for now I 
> > have turned it back off, because it is a security issue. Thoughts?
> >
> > The next build will be released with the new installer in any case.
> 
> Remember to put the revised update.new.cmd on the website please.

Done.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091024/7ade686a/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to