On Saturday 24 October 2009 19:37:08 zero3 wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:56:49 +0100, Matthew Toseland > <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Friday 23 October 2009 23:54:36 Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> On Friday 23 October 2009 23:27:34 zero3 wrote: > >> > > >> > Awesomeness! > >> > > >> > Did the merge succeed without issues? Any problematic conflicts? > >> > >> Several files had issues, I sided with the beta branch. > >> > > >> > The reason for the "Browse Freenet" to "Launch Freenet" rename in the > >> > first > >> > place, was that Freenet is starting to do much other stuff than > >> > "browsing > >> > [websites]". Mail, forums, IM, file sharing. "Browse" sounds a bit > >> > misleading as a common verb for that. Maybe something completely > >> > different? > >> > >> Open Freenet? > >> > > >> > I'm responsible for turning the incognito flag back on. I really think > >> > the > >> > block should be placed in Freenet (by simply checking the user-agent), > >> > as > >> > the block can then easily be removed on a new build when Google have > >> > fixed > >> > Chrome. If it's placed in the launcher, we can't push the update to > >> > enable > >> > it again later on, as we depend on people updating their helper > >> > executables > >> > themselves. Which they probably won't (it's possible via the new tray > >> > manager though). > >> > >> Hmmm, okay. It is disabled in fproxy at the moment, so I will reinstate > >> the change you made, but I will add comments on both sides. > >> > > Done. Any thoughts on Launch Freenet vs Open Freenet? We do tell the user > > that it will run in the background anyway, so maybe launch is okay? > > Roger that. Either works for me. I don't really have an opinion on which is > best. The Danish translation for either of them would be the same, > actually.
So far we have: Launch Freenet - too close to start freenet, although we do explicitly say we are running it in background, and with the rabbit icon too, it's not a biggie Open Freenet Use Freenet Browse Freenet - we don't only browse, however i doubt this is an issue nowadays, people do everything on the web At the risk of starting a bikeshed war, anyone have any opinion? Launch Freenet isn't too horrible so will stand for now... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091024/9a6d2bc4/attachment.pgp>
