Hi, thanks for suggestions. 2010/8/2 Ximin Luo <infinity0 at gmx.com>:
> What are your intentions for the package? Are you building these just so > freenet has some .debs? In this case we can host our own APT repository, with > our own keys, and I can set that up with reprepro. > > Or do you plan to make it an official Debian package (it will have to stay in > sid for a while, and not go to testing or stable; or maybe put it in > debian-volatile?) I think freenet satisfies DFSG but I dunno about the > "Standards Version" stuff. Then there is freenet-ext.jar, which will probably > have to be broken up into individual packages. In the long run, freenet should be a part of Debian -- that's my ultimate goal. However, I think it would be better for now if the project would have an official APT repository or such. > IMO "freenet" or maybe "freenetd" is a better name, because it's easier to > search for. Not many users refer to it as "fred", and it will confuse people > who do `aptitude search` or synaptic search. Right. I changed the package name from "fred" to "freenet-daemon". I think it's more descriptive. Best regards, MH -- Masayuki Hatta <mhatta at gmail.com>
