I've made a few tweaks of mhatta's package, to fit a bit better with the FHS. Same repo (debian-staging) - but make sure to checkout the "dir-struct" branch from fred-staging or it won't work.
Pre-built packages are available here: https://downloads.freenetproject.org/~infinity0/ Summary of directory structure: drwxrwsr-x root freenet /etc/freenet drwxrwsr-x root freenet /etc/freenet/noderef drwxr-sr-x freenet adm /var/lib/freenet/complete drwxr-sr-x freenet adm /var/lib/freenet/plugins drwxr-sr-x freenet adm /var/lib/freenet/state drwxr-sr-x freenet adm /var/lib/freenet/store drwxr-s--- freenet adm /var/log/freenet drwxr-x--- freenet freenet /var/run/freenet drwx------ freenet freenet /tmp/freenet X On 03/08/10 07:49, Masayuki Hatta wrote: > Hi, thanks for suggestions. > > 2010/8/2 Ximin Luo <infinity0 at gmx.com>: > >> What are your intentions for the package? Are you building these just so >> freenet has some .debs? In this case we can host our own APT repository, with >> our own keys, and I can set that up with reprepro. >> >> Or do you plan to make it an official Debian package (it will have to stay in >> sid for a while, and not go to testing or stable; or maybe put it in >> debian-volatile?) I think freenet satisfies DFSG but I dunno about the >> "Standards Version" stuff. Then there is freenet-ext.jar, which will probably >> have to be broken up into individual packages. > > In the long run, freenet should be a part of Debian -- that's my > ultimate goal. However, I think it would be better for now if the > project would have an official APT repository or such. > >> IMO "freenet" or maybe "freenetd" is a better name, because it's easier to >> search for. Not many users refer to it as "fred", and it will confuse people >> who do `aptitude search` or synaptic search. > > Right. I changed the package name from "fred" to "freenet-daemon". I > think it's more descriptive. > > Best regards, > MH >
