On Monday 02 August 2010 06:19:30 Masayuki Hatta wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Almost a year ago, I made Debian/Ubuntu packaging scripts for
> Freenet(fred) & Co.(fms, jsite, etc.)[1].  Since I've been quite
> busy(and my Debian-running laptop crashed), I largely abandoned them
> for a while.  However, recently I could find some time (and saw some
> interesting discussion here about Debian/FHS compliance), I managed to
> update fred package to the current revision 1263.  I think the users
> of this package can use Freenet really out of the box.  My packaging
> is as much faithful to Debian/FHS as I could, so you may use this as a
> test bed(of course, there are still many problem such as putting
> freenet.ini in /var/lib/fred instead of more proper /etc/fred or
> somewhere, etc).
> 
> You may get pre-built(on Debian amd64) debs from under
> http://people.debian.org/~mhatta/debian, and of course you may rebuild
> them if you want(Build-Deps are carefully set).  Also, this time I
> pushed files into Freenet GitHub repo(debian-staging).  See
> debian-staging/README for building instructions.
> 
> BTW, I noticed a few problem:
> 
> 1. Currently, so-called headless build (without setting DISPLAY)
> fails.  This is a serious problem since the automated build daemon is
> quite common not only in Debian but also other distros in general
> these days.  Seems the culprit is AWT, but I can't figure out why.  I
> attached the log from failed build session using by pbuilder[2].
> 
> 2. The build system around GWT is not so sophisticated, IMHO.  Seems
> it requires to put some needed .jar's into generator/js/lib,  and the
> file name in build.xml is wrong(GWT.lib.dev should be
> gwt-dev-linux.jar on GNU/Linux), etc.
> 
> 3. The home-brew build of freenet-ext.jar still fails.  Is there
> anyone who could actually do that?
> 
> 4. Still not using Java wrapper(thus automated update doesn't work).
> I did begin to work on this a year ago, but I need to refresh my
> memory now...also, as toad puts it, it can be debatable whether it
> should be allowed to modify the installed binary(in this case
> /usr/share/java/freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar or such) by means other than
> installing updated .deb., at least FHS-wise.
> 
> Maybe more,  I'll let you know when I encountered it...
> 
> As always, help/comments/suggestions/hacks are highly welcomed.  Also,
> if it's okay I'll add some information about this packaging into Wiki.

Please link it from here. I haven't found much so far, but maybe I did the 
wrong search.

http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Linux_Packages
> 
> Best regards,
> MH
> 
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/devl at freenetproject.org/msg23430.html
> 
> [2] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/pbuilder.html.en
> 
> -- 
> Masayuki Hatta <mhatta at gmail.com>
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101016/b0434555/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to