On Thursday 18 February 2010 09:26:55 Daniel Cheng wrote: > Hi all, > > Do we still concern memory usage? > I am seeing the memory usage of freenet climb higher and higher in > recently release. > It is no longer possible to run a node in an 128m memory box. > > With 3c02c397bfea7418d5d311ba481c3b3c7df96e2e, may I say the > promise/envision of low-memory/embeded usage dead/failed ?
Incrementing a 4 KiB buffer to 32 KiB won't hurt anyone, will it? If the JVM is smart then it will usually even use the stack for this. - I incremented it because very small buffers usually cause low throughput especially when used with harddisks. We can meet in the middle at 16 KiB if you really have a problem with it :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100218/ff6ab7b4/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100218/ff6ab7b4/attachment.pgp>
