On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:28 AM, xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010 09:26:55 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Do we still concern memory usage? >> I am seeing the memory usage of freenet climb higher and higher in >> recently release. >> It is no longer possible to run a node in an 128m memory box. >> >> With 3c02c397bfea7418d5d311ba481c3b3c7df96e2e, may I say the >> promise/envision of low-memory/embeded usage dead/failed ? > > Incrementing a 4 KiB buffer to 32 KiB won't hurt anyone, will it? > If the JVM is smart then it will usually even use the stack for this. > > - I incremented it because very small buffers usually cause low throughput > especially when used with harddisks. > > We can meet in the middle at 16 KiB if you really have a problem with it :)
Well, is there an actual performance improvement? Does there have to be a fixed size, or can it depend on the global memory limit? Evan Daniel
