On Friday 11 Feb 2011 21:39:34 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Saturday 05 February 2011 18:39:49 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you > > can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably > > static IP address (or dyndns name), and a reasonable amount of bandwidth > > (especially upstream), and a reasonably stable node, please send me your > > opennet noderef (from the strangers page in advanced mode), and enable "Be > > a seednode" in the advanced config. Thanks. > > How much upstream do I need exactly? > > I can offer about 50kB/s (damn asymmetric DSL?), dyndns is no problem.
That's what I used to use when I was a seednode. It's a bit painful but it works. > > Does that suffice? > > Best wishes, > Arne > -- > Ein W?rfel System - einfach saubere Regeln: > > - http://1w6.org > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110212/bb3cec79/attachment.pgp>
