On Sunday 05 Aug 2012 17:20:09 Ian Clarke wrote: > These look good, although of course it will be critically important that we > get the text right, since it's essential that people understand what risks > they are taking.
One specific difficulty is everyone is going to choose "Maximum Security" (or "High Security" if we don't offer max). IMHO we need it to be clear - before the user actually clicks a button - that you can't use High Security unless you know people already on Freenet. > > I think it's ok to just support reasonably recent versions of Internet > Explorer, even Google doesn't support IE7. > > I personally think it is fine to require JavaScript be enabled, but I know > that others disagree. I don't think a non-javascript fallback will be a problem. > > Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120806/8293284b/attachment.pgp>
