On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote: > Jean-Vincent Drean wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Note: It's important to write somewhere clearly that Xlet projects >>> are >>> not done by the xwiki dev team and not supported by the xwiki dev >>> team >>> (and thus that the quality depends on the contributor(s)). >>> >> >> +1 with the proposal but I'd prefer to name the project "contrib" >> since it's quite common and speaks for itself (particuraly >> considering >> the comment from Vincent above). WDYT ? > > Yeah "contrib" has the advantage of being self-explanatory... > > I don't have strong feelings on this. "contrib" makes our job easier > since it's less to explain, so Id be +0 for it over "xlet".
I agree xlet is not very self speaking and so far we've chosen meaningful names for our top level projects. +1 for "contrib" (or even with "contribution" which is the more correct name). Thanks -Vincent > Jerome. > >> See http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Index+of+%2Fcontrib%22 >> >> Thanks, >> JV. _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
