On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:45, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote: > For the repository organization, I propose the following : > > xlet/ (http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/xlet/) > |__applications/ > |__trunk/ > |__xapp1/ > |__xapp2/ > [...] > |__xappN/ > |__branches/ > [...] > |__tags/ > [...] > |__extensions/ > [...] > |__macros/ > [...] > |__modules/ > [...] > |__plugins/ > [...] > |__skins/ > [...] > > Each of the first level sub-directory (applications, extensions, macros, > etc.) having the same meaning of is currently defined on code.xwiki.org > > WDYT ?
I'm not sure it's the right way, i think i would prefer to have the projects directly under xlet/ and have each project decide its own organization. It's a real pain currently to release plugin and applications which for lot of them should be released together, we should try to go the right way this time for a new repository. > > Jerome. > > Jerome Velociter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The subject has been discussed already, see for example >> http://markmail.org/message/h5e2qinrhsf2slww >> >> The idea is to create a new top level project for modules (modules in >> the sense of everything applications, macros, components, plugins, skin >> extensions, etc.) that are not part of any products (or the platform) >> and that are not necessarily contributed by the XWiki development team. >> >> The difference with the sandbox is that sandbox is a place for modules >> being incubated, and that are not in a finished state. Thus, I think one >> of the rule for introducing new modules in the xlet repository would be >> that a functional version of the module should be released and available >> for download (for example on code.xwiki.org). >> >> The name "xlet" is the name we've use historically to talk about this >> repository, this is open for discussion. (personally I like the name - >> we have to agree this is how we want to name a XWiki "pluggable module" >> in the large sense). >> >> Here is my +1 for the above >> >> I would also like to propose that we create a new category of JIRA >> projects : "XWiki Contributed Xlets" (or equivalent name) for such >> projects that desire to track issues for their released module, and have >> the tracker hosted by XWiki.org. I believe this will make easier to have >> real release cycles for such modules (for example, we can link to the >> JIRA project from the code.xwiki.org "module" page so that users can >> report issues instead of using the comments, we can use JIRAs changelog >> for release notes on the download page, etc.) >> >> And my +1 for this second proposal >> >> Please, let me know what you think >> Jerome. >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
