On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:02, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 20:37, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Vincent Massol wrote: >>>> Note: It's important to write somewhere clearly that Xlet projects >>>> are >>>> not done by the xwiki dev team and not supported by the xwiki dev >>>> team >>>> (and thus that the quality depends on the contributor(s)). >>>> >>>> It could also be mentioned that at some point an Xlet project >>>> could be >>>> elected to become a platform project if the interest is generic, if >>>> it's voted and if the quality is good enough. >>> >>> I agree. I think the best place for that would be a page on >>> code.xwiki.org. >>> >>> I don't think we need a new wiki for the forge (except technically >>> - for >>> SVN), I would be to aggregate all info that concern contrib in >>> code.xwiki.org since they are closely related. >>> >>> BTW I forgot to mention in the original email, I think we should >>> propose >>> a generic maven groupId for individuals or projects that don't want >>> to >>> come up with their own. Something like "org.xwiki.contrib". >> >> all projects are supposed to have at least a name and generally can >> use org.xwiki.myproject I think > > The current rule is org.xwiki.<top level project> so if contrib is a > top level project it seems logical to have org.xwiki.contrib.
contrib is a repository of top level projects not a project itself IMO > > -Vincent > >> >>> >>> wdyt ? >>> >>> Jerome. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
