On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 15:22, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote: > Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:45, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> For the repository organization, I propose the following : >>> >>> xlet/ (http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/xlet/) >>> |__applications/ >>> |__trunk/ >>> |__xapp1/ >>> |__xapp2/ >>> [...] >>> |__xappN/ >>> |__branches/ >>> [...] >>> |__tags/ >>> [...] >>> |__extensions/ >>> [...] >>> |__macros/ >>> [...] >>> |__modules/ >>> [...] >>> |__plugins/ >>> [...] >>> |__skins/ >>> [...] >>> >>> Each of the first level sub-directory (applications, extensions, macros, >>> etc.) having the same meaning of is currently defined on code.xwiki.org >>> >>> WDYT ? >> >> I'm not sure it's the right way, i think i would prefer to have the >> projects directly under xlet/ and have each project decide its own >> organization. It's a real pain currently to release plugin and >> applications which for lot of them should be released together, we >> should try to go the right way this time for a new repository. > > Don't you think it's good to have that distinction by type of project ? > > Do you think we can manage this by project names ? (for example > "plugin-myplugin", "application-myapplication") It would mean making > sure contributors name their projects properly (it's easier to have them > create their projects in the proper directory properly IMO).
Don't mix projects and maven artifacts, as i said most of our applications have a corresponding plugin/component with the same version you would like to release all in once. For me it should be based on what you want to build, we will never want to build all the xlet/applications/trunk/ but build/release/branch/etc.. xlet/myproject/trunk/ all in once will be needed. If we separate all, it will just make contributor life a pain for nothing, list project is already http://code.xwiki.org. It also mean we can handling committers rights by project, if we see this as a start of a XWiki forge we should definitely organize by project and not by maven artifacts types. At worst why not have theses artifact type project base folder but we also need a "project" folder or something like that where you can put a more important contribution which have more than just one artifact. > > Jerome. >> >>> Jerome. >>> >>> Jerome Velociter wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> The subject has been discussed already, see for example >>>> http://markmail.org/message/h5e2qinrhsf2slww >>>> >>>> The idea is to create a new top level project for modules (modules in >>>> the sense of everything applications, macros, components, plugins, skin >>>> extensions, etc.) that are not part of any products (or the platform) >>>> and that are not necessarily contributed by the XWiki development team. >>>> >>>> The difference with the sandbox is that sandbox is a place for modules >>>> being incubated, and that are not in a finished state. Thus, I think one >>>> of the rule for introducing new modules in the xlet repository would be >>>> that a functional version of the module should be released and available >>>> for download (for example on code.xwiki.org). >>>> >>>> The name "xlet" is the name we've use historically to talk about this >>>> repository, this is open for discussion. (personally I like the name - >>>> we have to agree this is how we want to name a XWiki "pluggable module" >>>> in the large sense). >>>> >>>> Here is my +1 for the above >>>> >>>> I would also like to propose that we create a new category of JIRA >>>> projects : "XWiki Contributed Xlets" (or equivalent name) for such >>>> projects that desire to track issues for their released module, and have >>>> the tracker hosted by XWiki.org. I believe this will make easier to have >>>> real release cycles for such modules (for example, we can link to the >>>> JIRA project from the code.xwiki.org "module" page so that users can >>>> report issues instead of using the comments, we can use JIRAs changelog >>>> for release notes on the download page, etc.) >>>> >>>> And my +1 for this second proposal >>>> >>>> Please, let me know what you think >>>> Jerome. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devs mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
