> On 19 Aug 2016, at 09:58, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ok I’ve started.
>> 
>> 3 things:
>> 
>> * I’ve started defining what we mean by a recommended app, see 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ExtensionCode/RecommendedExtensions/
>> * I’ve processed the first 2 pages of the LT on the home page of e.x.o. (ie 
>> the first 60 extensions) and I’ve marked 11 as recommended so far: 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ExtensionCode/RecommendedExtensions/
>> * I’m hesitating for the following extensions. Specifically I need to know 
>> what their authors think and whether they’re ok to support them actively. I 
>> also don’t know them enough to know of their quality. Feel free to comment 
>> on them.
>> 
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Recent+Blog+Entries+Macros/
>>  ?
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/SunkenFlamingoTheme/
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/RtForm/
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Realtime+Netflux+Frontend/
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Realtime+Netflux+Backend/
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XQuiz/
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Condition+Macro/
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Suggest+LiveTable+Filter+Macro/
> 
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Let%27s+Encrypt+support/
> 
> This one will probably end up in XE in not too long anyway.
> 
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Derzelas+Script+Runner/
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XCarousel/
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Wiki+Analyzer+Application/
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Event+Listeners+Administration/
> 
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Filter+Script+API 
>> Note: we will expose the filter app, should we also expose the API?
> 
> No need to recommend this one for final users IMO, it's only supposed
> to be used as a dependency since it's mostly a script service.

So we need to set up a rule on this:

A) Do we want Recommended extensions to be only for users and not for devs?

For example: http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/JIRA+Module 
(it’s not used as any dependency of any other module)

My opinion: it’s ok not to list them we should only recommended end user 
extensions (i.e. for users & for admins but not for devs).

B) When we have extensions that are installed as dependencies of other 
recommended extensions should we not list them?

For example, I’ve recommended 
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/JIRA+Administration/ but 
it’s a dependency of 
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/JIRA+Macro

My opinion: it’s ok not to list extensions that are dependencies of recommended 
extensions, *unless* there are use cases for using them directly.

WDTR?

Thanks
-Vincent

> 
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/ZoneEdit+Macro
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/SVG+Rasterizing+API
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Trusted+Headers+Authentication+Adapter
>> - 
>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Trusted+authentication+framework
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Mail+address+encryptor
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWikiTube
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XFF+Maven+Plugin 
>> Note: wrong author!!!
>> - http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Rights+UI+Simplifier
>> 
> 
> You should also recommend
> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/XWiki+Authenticator+Trusted+LDAP
> (until I find time to merge it with
> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/LDAP/Authenticator/).
> 
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> 
>> The result is here:
>> 
>>> On 18 Aug 2016, at 19:36, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’m starting the work on this. BTW several of you have replied about EM but 
>>> this mail was only for “e.x.o”  FTM (see the subject).
>>> 
>>> The idea is to implement something similar to what Caty proposed at
>>> http://markmail.org/message/cr5edm27qcag6n3q
>>> 
>>> I’m starting the work.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 23 May 2016, at 10:39, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi devs,
>>>> 
>>>> We have a lot of entries on extensions.xwiki.org (869 as of today) and 
>>>> this causes some problems for our users:
>>>> 
>>>> P1) A lot of them are not of good quality (they don’t work with the latest 
>>>> versions, they are complex to use, they’ve not been updated for a long 
>>>> time and are doing old and deprecated ways of doing things such as not 
>>>> providing an entry in the Applications Panel for example, they’re not just 
>>>> polished, etc) and this causes frustrations for our users. Note that this 
>>>> also reflects on the overall quality of the XWiki project and product.
>>>> 
>>>> P2) It’s hard for users to locate good extensions among the rest.
>>>> 
>>>> We’ve started addressing P1) by introducing ratings on e.x.o. This is not 
>>>> fully successful so far because we don’t have enough people voting and 
>>>> because those ratings are not used to display/filter extensions on the 
>>>> Extensions LT or inside XWiki in the EM UI. So we need to continue this 
>>>> effort.
>>>> 
>>>> Note that this proposal is not addressing non-extensions such as snippets 
>>>> which we’ll need to move elsewhere at some point but that becomes less 
>>>> important with the proposal below.
>>>> 
>>>> Proposal
>>>> =======
>>>> 
>>>> I’d like to propose an additional strategy that, IMO, is better suited for 
>>>> the size of our community: curation. Curation is the process of 
>>>> hand-selecting the best extensions and marking them as recommended. The 
>>>> idea would be to list recommended extensions first on the e.x.o home page, 
>>>> in the EM UI in XWiki and even in extension search results. In the EM UI, 
>>>> an idea would also be to have a new “Recommended Extensions” filter in 
>>>> addition to the existing filters (core extensions, installed extensions, 
>>>> etc) and that would be the default filter on the “Add Extensions” UI.
>>>> 
>>>> I propose to add a “Recommended” xproperty in the Repository app for that. 
>>>> We can decide whether we want this just for e.x.o or committed in the 
>>>> Repository app in xwiki-platform.
>>>> 
>>>> Then we need to decide about the curation process:
>>>> 
>>>> * The XWiki core committers are in charge (i.e. have the responsibility) 
>>>> of monitoring the apps that are marked “Recommended”, ie. validating that 
>>>> it’s done correctly. XWiki core committers have the authorization to unset 
>>>> an app that was marked a recommended by a community member.
>>>> * We wouldn’t offer a simple way in the UI to mark an extension as 
>>>> recommended since we don’t want everyone who has an account on xwiki.org 
>>>> to start marking apps as recommended. OTOH we want to allow people from 
>>>> the xwiki community to help out. So the way to mark an extension as 
>>>> recommended would be to use the object editor (for now, we can define a 
>>>> better implementation mechanism later on).
>>>> * We define some basic rules that extensions need to follow at minimum to 
>>>> be accepted as recommended. These will be our guidelines to avoid conflict 
>>>> of opinions (although there’s always the possibility in which case it’s 
>>>> resolved through a vote):
>>>> - Need to work on LTS + latest XWiki version (ie. ATM that would be 7.4.x 
>>>> and 8.1)
>>>> - Need to present a polished aspect and be easily usable
>>>> - Need to follow most of the best practices defined on 
>>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ApplicationDevelopmentBestPractices.
>>>>  Some important examples: technical pages are hidden, extension is 
>>>> registered in the app bar when it makes sense, extension is 
>>>> internationalized (if it makes sense), pages are in xwiki syntax 2.0+.
>>>> 
>>>> WDYT?
>>>> 
>>>> I’m willing to help do the work and mark extensions as recommended.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to