FYI we dropped the installer because it was a pain to maintain and causing too 
much trouble (FTR izpack allowed to bundled the JRE too).

I’m not sure a this stage we should go back to that.

Here’s an idea:
* Merge Try and Download on xwiki.org into a single entry point
* Have a wizard in that entry point and ask some questions to the user (with 
the option to skip the wizard) to direct the user to use the right distribution 
for him/her.
* Thus, promote more the cloud option for users who are not technical and want 
a quick way to test xwiki.

It wouldn’t solve everything for sure but maybe it would help?

Thanks
-Vincent

> On 14 May 2018, at 11:32, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> There seem to be some resources on the topic:
> 
> https://github.com/libgdx/libgdx/wiki/Bundling-a-JRE
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7071133/how-to-bundle-a-jre-with-launch4j
> https://codeiseasy.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/including-a-jre-in-a-tycho-build/
> 
> ...so it's not such an uncommon practice.
> 
> On the legal side, OpenJDK should be the obvious choice:
> https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/4824/is-it-legal-to-bundle-oracles-jre-with-an-open-source-program/4826
> 
> IMO, it would make sense to provide the full and ready to test package,
> rather than an only 90% ready to test one.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eduard
> 
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]
>> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> AFAIR, Eclipse also does this (i.e. bundle their own JRE), we could look
>>> into how they do it.
>> 
>> Eclipse JDT comes with its own Java compiler but you are supposed to
>> install Java to run Eclipse itself.
>> 
>>> 
>>> On a quick check, OpenJDK's JRE is only 38.4 MB (
>>> http://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/8) ... I find that acceptable.
>> 
>> Not sure the license allow us to embbed what's on that page.
>> 
>> 38.4MB is probably only for one system, I think you need 3 of those
>> (Linux, Windows, Mac)
>> 
>>> 
>>> FTR, the JDK is 164 MB.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Eduard
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Thomas Mortagne <
>> [email protected]
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> One issue with embedded Java (OpenJDK I guess) is that it would make
>>>> the zip quite huge.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> On the palliative side (i.e. not actually fixing, but at least making
>>>> life
>>>>> a bit easier), we might consider a naming scheme for the downloadable
>>>> that
>>>>> includes that supported java version, e.g. xwiki-10.3-java8.zip
>> (though
>>>>> this might also lead users to thinking that the java 8 runtime is
>>>>> included... which might not be that bad of an idea, if we think about
>>>> it...
>>>>> at least for the zip version that is for demo purposes, which already
>>>>> contains the web server, the database, but still expects the user to
>>>>> understand and install the correct Java runtime, which makes no
>> sense.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, yeah... TL;DR: add the java8 runtime to the .zip package and make
>>>> life
>>>>> easier for everyone. Optionally (though not sure if needed anymore,
>> if we
>>>>> bundle it), include it in the .zip file name.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Of course, the production install, if done manually (i.e. not through
>>>>> .deb/.rpm packages), expects that the user reads the documentation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Eduard
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi devs, here’s a feedback we received, FYI.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ideas?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Vincent Massol
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Get started with XWiki
>>>>>>> Date: 14 May 2018 at 09:10:06 CEST
>>>>>>> To: XXX
>>>>>>> Cc: XXX
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 12 May 2018, at 14:25, Christian XXX wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It's not working.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> And as usual ith java, the log does not help. Maybe if I were an
>>>>>> expert? But an app is supposed to be installed by just 'smart' users,
>>>> not
>>>>>> experts.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you choose the easy installation methods we propose then it’s
>> easy
>>>>>> and you have nothing to do.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Which distribution did you choose and use?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> And there is no help from the website.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Oracle Linux 7.
>>>>>>>> Linux localhost.localdomain 4.1.12-124.14.5.el7uek.x86_64 #2 SMP
>> Fri
>>>>>> May 4 15:26:53 PDT 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>>>> Java 10
>>>>>>>> Xwiki 10.3
>>>>>>>> tomcat.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If it is not compatible whith this java. It should not install.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It’s just not been tested with Java 10 yet. It’s not even fully
>>>> working
>>>>>> with Java 9.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Note that it’s hard to check for the java version for all the
>>>>>> distributions since XWiki is a webapp and the XWiki WAR can just be
>>>> dropped
>>>>>> in a servlet container and thus we don’t have a startup script and a
>>>> place
>>>>>> where we can put a check. All we could do is have a Servlet Listener
>>>> that
>>>>>> would emit a big stack trace (like the one you got) and that would
>> say
>>>> at
>>>>>> the innermost level that XWiki requires Java <= 8. But even that
>>>> wouldn’t
>>>>>> be good since it would prevent testing in Java 9+. We want feedback
>> from
>>>>>> users about what works/what doesn’t work so improve support for Java
>> 9
>>>> and
>>>>>> 10.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> If it is compatible with only one version of java, which one?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You need to read the installation page ;)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> See http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/
>>>>>> AdminGuide/Installation/ and especially:
>>>>>>> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/
>>>>>> AdminGuide/Installation/#HHardwareandSoftwarerequirements
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Here is the error:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Error number 4001 in 4: Error while evaluating velocity template
>>>>>> colorThemeInit.vm
>>>>>>>> Error number 4001 in 4: Error while evaluating velocity template
>>>>>> colorThemeInit.vm
>>>>>>>> com.xpn.xwiki.XWikiException: Error number 4001 in 4: Error while
>>>>>> evaluating velocity template colorThemeInit.vm
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No standard field
>> found
>>>>>> for reverse order comparator!
>>>>>>>>     at org.jboss.marshalling.river.Protocol.<clinit>(Protocol.
>>>>>> java:276)
>>>>>>>>     ... 249 mor
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [snip
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No standard field
>> found
>>>>>> for reverse order comparator!
>>>>>>>>     at org.jboss.marshalling.river.Protocol.<clinit>(Protocol.
>>>>>> java:276)
>>>>>>>>     ... 249 mor
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What this says is that JBoss Infinispan (which we use) is not
>>>> compatible
>>>>>> with Java 10. Apparently this is fixed in recent version of JBoss
>>>>>> Marshalling: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBMAR-216. We probably
>>>> just
>>>>>> need to wait for JBoss Infinispan to release a new version that uses
>>>> JBoss
>>>>>> Marshalling 2.1.0.Final.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What would be awesome would be for you to report the problem of
>> using
>>>>>> XWiki with Java 10 on https://jira.xwiki.org so that we can have an
>>>> issue
>>>>>> for it and work to make it work.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Note that I’m replying to this message to help you out but it’s not
>>>> the
>>>>>> right place to post a question and get help normally. For that we
>> have a
>>>>>> user forum at https://forum.xwiki.org/.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I’m sorry you had some issues. OTOH you’re looking for trouble by
>>>> trying
>>>>>> with Java 10. There are very few (if any!) java app that currently
>> work
>>>>>> with Java 9 and 10. You’d be much better off using Java 8. On the
>>>> positive
>>>>>> side, if you raise the issue on https://jira.xwiki.org, then you
>> will
>>>>>> transform your negative experience into a positive one, by
>> contributing
>>>> to
>>>>>> the development of XWiki and helping out future users.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -Vincent Massol
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>> 

Reply via email to