Hi Caty, > On 31 Oct 2018, at 14:59, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]> wrote: > > + 1 to have: > Tomcat 8.5.x > Jetty 9.x > > Not sure why we have 2 entries for Jetty. If we want to provide 2 > Installation links, then we should have 2 links inside the "Installation > Instructions" column, but not sure we need 2 rows for Jetty. It's confusing.
I've just spent 10 minutes trying to merge them and couldn’t find something better… So the reasons for the 2 lines is that we support 2 packagings of Jetty: * custom XWiki packaging of Jetty used in the XWiki Standalone distribution * official standard Jetty distribution as provided by the Jetty project Feel free to improve it if you find a better way. Thanks -Vincent > > Thanks, > Caty > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:57 AM Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:53, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I know but it should also be on the support page IMO. >> >> I prefer to have it in a single place (no dup). We could link to it >> though. Right now the flow is that you find the requirements first and then >> this is from there that you find the support pages. >> >> But I’m not against linking in the 2 directions. What’s important for me >> is that all requirements are listed on >> https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/#HHardwareandSoftwarerequirements >> since that’s the main place. >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:44 AM Vincent Massol <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:42, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Actually there is another very important thing missing in that page: >>>>> we should also indicate explicitly the minimum version of the Servlet >>>>> API required by XWiki (currently 3.0.1). >>>> >>>> This is listed on >> https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/#HHardwareandSoftwarerequirements >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:30 AM Adel Atallah <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Vincent, >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Adel >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:07 AM Marius Dumitru Florea >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Marius >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vincent Massol <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We now have >>>>>>>> >> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrategy/ >>>>>>>> but it’s not precise enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’m proposing the following: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * Mention the supported version cycle and mention that we support >> the >>>>>>>> latest version of the cycle. >>>>>>>> * For Tomcat, I propose to say we support Tomcat 8.x (which means >> Tomcat >>>>>>>> 8.5.34 as of today, see “latest” tag on >> https://hub.docker.com/_/tomcat/) >>>>> >>>>> Actually from Tomcat point of view 8.0.x and 8.5.x are two different >>>>> cycles so it would be more clear to say we support 8.5.x. >>>>> >>>>>>>> * For Jetty (standalone packaging or standard), I propose to say we >>>>>>>> support Jetty 9.x (which means Jetty 9.4.12 as of today, see >> “latest” tag >>>>>>>> on https://hub.docker.com/_/jetty/) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thomas Mortagne >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Mortagne >> >>
