If you are curious about the trends:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?cat=13&q=%2Fm%2F01chz8,%2Fm%2F01b55d,%2Fm%2F0cdjtt,%2Fm%2F08pwxx,%2Fm%2F037njz
https://plumbr.io/blog/java/most-popular-java-application-servers-2017-edition

Thanks,
Caty

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:14 PM Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Caty,
>
> > On 31 Oct 2018, at 14:59, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > + 1 to have:
> > Tomcat 8.5.x
> > Jetty 9.x
> >
> > Not sure why we have 2 entries for Jetty. If we want to provide 2
> > Installation links, then we should have 2 links inside the "Installation
> > Instructions" column, but not sure we need 2 rows for Jetty. It's
> confusing.
>
> I've just spent 10 minutes trying to merge them and couldn’t find
> something better…
>
> So the reasons for the 2 lines is that we support 2 packagings of Jetty:
> * custom XWiki packaging of Jetty used in the XWiki Standalone distribution
> * official standard Jetty distribution as provided by the Jetty project
>
> Feel free to improve it if you find a better way.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Caty
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:57 AM Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:53, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I know but it should also be on the support page IMO.
> >>
> >> I prefer to have it in a single place (no dup). We could link to it
> >> though. Right now the flow is that you find the requirements first and
> then
> >> this is from there that you find the support pages.
> >>
> >> But I’m not against linking in the 2 directions. What’s important for me
> >> is that all requirements are listed on
> >>
> https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/#HHardwareandSoftwarerequirements
> >> since that’s the main place.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Vincent
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:44 AM Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:42, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually there is another very important thing missing in that page:
> >>>>> we should also indicate explicitly the minimum version of the Servlet
> >>>>> API required by XWiki (currently 3.0.1).
> >>>>
> >>>> This is listed on
> >>
> https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/#HHardwareandSoftwarerequirements
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> -Vincent
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:30 AM Adel Atallah <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Vincent,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Adel
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:07 AM Marius Dumitru Florea
> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Marius
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vincent Massol <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We now have
> >>>>>>>>
> >>
> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrategy/
> >>>>>>>> but it’s not precise enough.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I’m proposing the following:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * Mention the supported version cycle and mention that we support
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> latest version of the cycle.
> >>>>>>>> * For Tomcat, I propose to say we support Tomcat 8.x (which means
> >> Tomcat
> >>>>>>>> 8.5.34 as of today, see “latest” tag on
> >> https://hub.docker.com/_/tomcat/)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually from Tomcat point of view 8.0.x and 8.5.x are two different
> >>>>> cycles so it would be more clear to say we support 8.5.x.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> * For Jetty (standalone packaging or standard), I propose to say
> we
> >>>>>>>> support Jetty 9.x (which means Jetty 9.4.12 as of today, see
> >> “latest” tag
> >>>>>>>> on https://hub.docker.com/_/jetty/)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>> -Vincent
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Thomas Mortagne
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thomas Mortagne
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to