The iso for this really belongs to ADB - if this is going to be something we actually promote I'd prefer for the ADB guys to own more of this so we can actually have a chance of this being real, vs a spin off thing that doesn't ultimately go anywhere.
As long as the mini bit isn't making too many assumptions about the ISO, this is something we can iterate on. On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Jimmi Dyson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 July 2016 at 16:09, Clayton Coleman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Jul 7, 2016, at 4:24 AM, Jimmi Dyson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I've started minishift (fork of minikube) at > >> https://github.com/jimmidyson/minishift if anyone wants to try it out. > >> Will publish a first release of it later today or tomorrow hopefully. > >> All feedback welcome - building is pretty simple, as long as you have > >> the Go toolchain setup. > >> > >>> would this be able to run red hat's variation of docker ? > >> > >> Of course we can but the question is what benefit it brings? As this > >> is only for single dev, easy getting started & play what Docker > >> version is being used should be inconsequential to the ux. The only > >> problem I can see with using RHT's Docker is the size of the ISO that > >> minishift will need to download to start the VM. Right now this is > >> ~36MB & this allows for really speedy startup (effectively no waiting > >> for download). Switching to RHT's Docker & potentially CentOS/RHEL I > >> would expect this to grow, which isn't terrible but would affect the > >> ux somewhat. > > > > Not running the Red Hat Docker is a serious problem for OpenShift / > > Kube, simply given the instability and gaps in upstream Docker. While > > we're not running production workloads, it's really difficult to > > certify and fix issues. > > If someone can provide me with a URL to a simple tarball of RHT Docker > if it's available I'm more than happy to use that in the ISO, but > obviously don't want to have to include a full on yum install, etc > which will bloat the ISO for little value in this case. > > > > > I have trouble believing we can't match he size of that iso in practical > terms. > > > > > >> > >>> and how about openshift itself ? > >> > >> Minishift runs latest version of OpenShift (latest version at time of > >> build embedded in the minishift binary for speedy start up time) & I > >> am going to make the version configurable via flags which will > >> download the specified release from github on startup, with caching > >> for subsequent runs, etc. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jimmi > >> > >>> On 6 July 2016 at 08:32, Hardy Ferentschik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 06-Jul-2016 00:53, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >>>> looks great. would this be able to run red hat's variation of docker > ? and > >>>> how about openshift itself ? > >>> > >>> My thinking as well. Might be worth investigating. A miniopenshift > would have > >>> a great appeal. > >>> > >>> --Hardy > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Devtools mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools >
_______________________________________________ Devtools mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/devtools
